コラム

これが潘基文批判メモの全文だ

2009年08月24日(月)14時44分

 潘基文(バン・キムン)国連事務総長にとってはひどい金曜日の朝だった。
 
 ノルウェーのモナ・ユール次席国連大使は、本国外務省あての極秘書簡の中で、潘にはビジョンもリーダーシップも欠落していると酷評した。さらに潘が「意気地なし」でビルマ情勢の「傍観者」であり、彼の仕事には「成果がない」とこき下ろし、彼が及ぼした被害を指摘している。

 この書簡はメディアにリークされた

 今年6月には、フォーリン・ポリシー誌でジェーコブ・ハイルブランが同じ趣旨の強力な議論を展開していた。先見の明があったのでは?

 ユールの書簡の全文は以下のとおり(英語)。


Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon's fruitless visit to Burma in the beginning of July is indicative of a Secretary-General and an organization who are struggling to show leadership. In a time when the UN and the need for multilateral solutions to global crises are more needed than ever, Ban and the UN are conspicuous by their absence. During the last six months, where the follow-up to the many crises that left their imprint on the General Assembly during the fall should have brought the Secretary-General and the UN into play at full force, the opposite seems to have happened.

In relation to the financial crisis , neither the Secretary-General nor the General Assembly - despite the summit on the financial crisis during the end of June - have shown themselves to be the most important arena, and the vacuum is being filled by the G-20 and other actors. Ban's voice on behalf of the G-172 and the poor is barely being registered. And at times an invisible Secretary-General, in combination with a rather special president of the General Assembly, has to a large extent placed the UN on the sidelines and the organisation has not known when to act. In the environment/energy area the UN also struggles to be relevant, despite the planned climate summit at the opening of the General Assembly in the fall. Even though the Secretary-General repeats ad nauseam that Copenhagen must "seal the deal", there is widespread concern that the UN summit will not contribute anything worth mentioning in the process towards Copenhagen.

In the many political/security-related crises around the world the Secretary-General's leadership and ability to deliver on behalf of the international organization are also found wanting. Burma is a shining example. There was no shortage of warnings that the Secretary-General should not go at this time. The Americans were among the most sceptical of him going, while the British believed he should. Special Envoy Gambari was also sceptical at the outset, but Ban insisted. Gambari noted that recent negative press (with headlines such as "Whereabouts unknown" in The Times and "Nowhere Man" in Foreign Policy) had made Ban even more determined to visit Burma. After a seemingly fruitless visit by the Secretary-General, the UN's "good offices" will be made even more difficult. Special Envoy Gambari will have major problems during the aftermath, after "the top man" has failed and the generals in Yangoon no longer want to meet with him.

Another example of weak handling by the Secretary-General is the war in Sri Lanka . The Secretary-General was a powerless observer to thousands of civilians losing their lives and becoming displaced from their homes. The authorities in Colombo refused to see the Secretary-General while the war was ongoing, but he was heartily invited - and accepted an invitation - as soon as the war was "won". Even though the UN's humanitarian effort has been active and honest enough, the moral voice and authority of the Secretary-General has been missing.

In other "crises areas" such as Darfur, Somalia, Pakistan, Zimbabwe and not least the Congo , the Secretary-General's appeals, often irresolute and lacking in dedication, seem to fall on deaf ears. Many would also claim that the handling of the investigative committee, following the war in Gaza , ended with an unstable and overly careful follow up.

More surprising, and all the more disappointing, is that Ban Ki-moon has been almost absent on the issue of disarmament and non-proliferation. This was an issue he himself held forward as a principal area of focus before he took over his post. The re-organisation of the department for disarmament into an office directly under the Secretary-General, run by a High Representative, signalled a major focus on this area, also given the Secretary-General's background on the Korean peninsula. With discussions of a new non-proliferation agreement in 2010 and a U.S. administration that have put the theme much higher on the agenda, it is discouraging that the Secretary-General is not to a larger degree involved.

What all these examples have in common is that a spineless and charmless Secretary-General , has not compensated this by appointing high profile and visible coworkers. Ban has systematically appointed Special Representatives and top officals in the Secretariat who have not been visibly outstanding - with the exception of Afghanistan. In addition he seems to prefer to be in the center without competition from his coworkers and has implied quite clearly that press statements are for him exclusively. The result is that the UN is a less visible and relevant actor in various areas where it would have been natural and necessary for the UN to be engaged. An honorable exception is the appointment of Helen Clark as the new leader of UNDP . She has in a short time, done good things. It will be interesting to see if she will be given space to give the UN a profile in the area of development. As a woman from this side of the world, Clark could soon turn into a candidate for Ban´s second term.

It is common knowledge that it was a deliberate choice of the former US administration not to prefer an activist Secretary-General. The current American Administration has not yet signalled any changes in its postition towards Ban, however, there are rumours that in certain quarters in Washington Ban is refered to as a "one term SG." It is understood that people in the circles of Susan Rice and Hillary Clinton are very negative to Ban, but neither of them has given any declarations. China is also quite positive to him and it is primarily China who holds the key to Ban´s second mandate. Russia has for a long time been dissatisfied with the Secretary-General´s handling of both Kosovo and Georgia but also the lack of appointments of Russians to leading position at the UN. At the same time the Russians, however, have no problems with a not too-interventionist Secretary-General.

Half way through his term, one feels that the member states are increasingly negative towards Ban. Many considered that Ban should be given time and he would improve as he gained experience and any comparison with his charismatic predecessor was unfair. Among those, however, the tone has changed, and now the argument of his learning-potential has expired and the lack of charisma has become a burden. The Secretary-General seems to function quite well when he sticks to a script and performs at larger meetings and arrangements. The problem arises when he is "on his own" and is incapable of setting the agenda, inspiring enthousiasm and show leadership- not even internally. The consequence of Ban´s lack of engagement and interest in studying well enough the problems, is that he fails to be an effective actor or negotiator in the many negotiation processes he is supposed to handle.

The atmosphere in the "house" is described as being less than motivating. The decision making structure is hampered by the fact that all information both up and down is filtered by the omni-present chef de cabinet, Kim. After the latest round of negative media coverage, it is understood that the atmosphere on the 38th floor is rather tense . Ban has constant outbreaks of rage which even the most cautious and experienced staff find hard to tackle. The relations with the Deputy-Secretary-General Migiro are also tense and her marge de manouvre seems - if possible- to have decreased. There are constant rumours of replacements and reshuffling. In addition to constant rumours about Migiro leaving, there are rumours that the overwhelmingly well liked OCHA chief John Holmes will be promoted to chef de cabinet and that Nambiar will leave. Same goes with the head of DPA, Pascoe - Holmes is also tipped as a candidate for his succession. The Brits are understood to want that position "back". These are, however, only rumours and most likely Ban will continue with the same staff - at least until the end of the year. If that is enough to secure him another term, only time can tell.


──アニー・ラウリー
[米国東部時間2009年08月21日(金)11時12分更新]

Reprinted with permission from FP Passport, 24/8/2009. © 2009 by Washingtonpost.Newsweek Interactive, LLC.

プロフィール

ForeignPolicy.com

国際政治学者サミュエル・ハンチントンらによって1970年に創刊された『フォーリン・ポリシー』は、国際政治、経済、思想を扱うアメリカの外交専門誌。発行元は、ワシントン・ポスト・ニューズウィーク・インタラクティブ傘下のスレート・グループ。『PASSPORT:外交エディター24時』は、ワシントンの編集部が手がける同誌オンライン版のオリジナル・ブログ。

ニュース速報

ビジネス

日産、問題発覚・社長謝罪後も無資格者検査が一部で継

ビジネス

NAFTA再交渉、来年まで妥結持ち越し 基本問題で

ワールド

北朝鮮、中国共産党大会に祝賀メッセージ

ビジネス

英首相がEU閣僚と夕食会、EUは一段の譲歩要求

MAGAZINE

特集:中国予測はなぜ間違うのか

2017-10・24号(10/17発売)

何度も崩壊を予想されながら、終わらない共産党支配──。中国の未来を正しく読み解くために知っておくべきこと

グローバル人材を目指す

人気ランキング

  • 1

    ポルノ王がトランプの首に11億円の懸賞金!

  • 2

    石平「中国『崩壊』とは言ってない。予言したこともない」

  • 3

    北朝鮮危機、ニクソン訪中に匹敵する米中合意の可能性

  • 4

    北朝鮮「国連加盟国、米の軍事行動に参加しない限り…

  • 5

    年内にも発売されるセックスロボット、英研究者が禁…

  • 6

    早わかり衆院選 主な争点別の各党の選挙公約

  • 7

    オーストリアで「世界最年少」首相誕生へ 31歳が唱…

  • 8

    トランプ「ユネスコ脱退」、習近平「高笑い」

  • 9

    トランプに代わってクリントンが大統領になる道はま…

  • 10

    ネズミ被害に悩むワシントンDC、ストリート仕込みの…

  • 1

    米軍は北朝鮮を攻撃できない

  • 2

    イージス艦事故の黒幕は北朝鮮か? 最強の軍艦の思わぬ弱点

  • 3

    ポルノ王がトランプの首に11億円の懸賞金!

  • 4

    自転車大国オランダ、信号機を消してみたら起きたこ…

  • 5

    通勤時間というムダをなくせば、ニッポンの生産性は…

  • 6

    北朝鮮との裏取引を許さないアメリカの(意外な)制…

  • 7

    北朝鮮の送電網を破壊する、韓国「ブラックアウト爆…

  • 8

    カズオ・イシグロの「信頼できない語り手」とは

  • 9

    北朝鮮の金正恩が愛する実妹ヨジョン 党中枢部入り…

  • 10

    北朝鮮がフィッシング攻撃、米電力会社が標的に

  • 1

    「クラスで一番の美人は金正恩の性奴隷になった」

  • 2

    「北朝鮮はテロリストだ」 北で拘束された息子は異様な姿で帰国し死んだ

  • 3

    北朝鮮はなぜ日本を狙い始めたのか

  • 4

    「金正恩の戦略は失敗した」増大する北朝鮮国民の危…

  • 5

    トランプの挑発が、戦いたくない金正恩を先制攻撃に…

  • 6

    米軍は北朝鮮を攻撃できない

  • 7

    北朝鮮の女子大生が拷問に耐えきれず選んだ道とは...

  • 8

    中国が北朝鮮を攻撃する可能性が再び----米中の「北…

  • 9

    米朝戦争が起きたら犠牲者は何人になるのか

  • 10

    カンボジアで飼育されている巨大変異ブタ、安全なの…

PICTURE POWER

レンズがとらえた地球のひと・すがた・みらい

全く新しい政治塾開講。あなたも、政治しちゃおう。
日本再発見 シーズン2
定期購読
期間限定、アップルNewsstandで30日間の無料トライアル実施中!
メールマガジン登録
売り切れのないDigital版はこちら

MOOK

ニューズウィーク日本版 特別編集

最新版 アルツハイマー入門

絶賛発売中!